Monitoring
IThe efficient and effective management of a barrier
beach requires periodic monitoring to assess the health and state
of the beach. This monitoring ranges from observations and collection
of visual data such as photography, measurements relating to the
characteristics off the beach itself, and acquisition of data relating
to the conditions affecting the beach such as the wind and wave
climate. The Beach Management Manual (Simm et al., 1996) states
that these data are necessary for three reasons:
- To identify spatial and temporal trends,
determine their significance, and help to understand their causes;
- To provide information to assist in
the assessment and design of management strategies;
- To appraise the performance and impacts
of the adopted beach management methods.
Monitoring should be ongoing as opposed to a one-off
survey when coastal defences are installed, and ideally should be
initiated prior to the implementation of a management scheme that
would result in significant changes to the beach. If this is not
the case, then an educated decision as to the form of management
methods can not be made, or the likely effects of implementation
accurately predicted.
A record of adopted shoreline management activities
is as important as the data collection itself, enabling future analysis
to take changes in beach management into account when interpreting
information collected.
Monitoring should be undertaken as a co-ordinated
process with other bodies who may have an interest in coastal change
at the site, or the site itself in general. This would include bodies
such as English Nature who may confer a conservation designation
on to the beach.
Top
Which data to collect
Beach monitoring should not be undertaken without
a clear programme and procedures for data collection and an understanding
of why the data is required. When determining the monitoring programme
the individual character of the beach and the conditions affecting
it need to be considered, as well as the context within which the
monitoring is occurring.
Defra (2001) advise that the development of a
monitoring strategy should address a number of issues to determine
what should be measured and using what methods:
- The nature of the coastline: through the nature
of the coastal processes and features which could be measured
or recorded. From this, a decision regarding temporal and spatial
intervals for monitoring can be taken.
- Level of risk: analysis of current and potential
future risks along a length of coastline will enable priority
sites for monitoring to be chosen.
- Setting objectives: a reason for undertaking
the monitoring needs to be clarified.
- Selection of technique: measurement techniques
must reflect the objectives.
Simm et al. (1996) advise an initial site visit
for familiarisation and to enable an appropriate data-collection
programme to be set up. Types of data to be collected, modes of
collection and the accuracy/resolution required should be established
from the outset, with collection methods which are standardised,
repeatable, accurate and cost-effective introduced (Defra, 2001).
Information which is readily available in the public domain may
be used as part of the dataset and therefore not need to be especially
recorded. This may include data from wave and tidal gauges, or climate
conditions. The following list briefly describes the types of data
which may be collected.
- Beach data
Information about the changes in beach levels, plan-shape,
sediments and the character of the beach need to be recorded to
assess and understand the beach conditions, the processes in operation
and the way the beach responds to changes. This element of the
monitoring is likely to involve a visual inspection of the site,
noting obvious changes in beaches such as the level against a
structure or the change in beach sediment, for example, with a
photographic record taken for comparison. Beach profiles should
be undertaken to assess changes in beach levels, and identify
the cross-shore shape of the beach. These should be measured from
a fixed base-point in a noted direction so that subsequent monitoring
visits can measure the same profile. The beach plan shape should
be assessed – this can be done by GPS surveys of the beach,
or through use of aerial photography or airborne data such as
LIDAR – although this may be expensive.
- Structure condition
An inspection of any existing defences should be undertaken
to assess their impact, and also to enable repair and maintenance
when necessary. This should involve identification of the defences
and recording of their condition, as well as assessment of their
impact on the surround sediment.
- Environmental data
The environmental value of the site and its changing conditions
should be established to aid with decisions on how to manage any
problems. Data of this type may already be collected by other
organisations especially if the site is a designated conservation
area. Useful information includes an inspection of the flora and
fauna with species abundance and distribution recorded, and information
regarding human activities in the area. Water quality and sediment
quality sampling may be undertaken, although again this information
is usually available.
- Bathymetric data
Knowledge of the nearshore bathymetry enables beach processes
over the whole level of beach influence to be understood rather
than just beach processes extending to the low water level, and
beaches are often influenced by nearshore sources of sediments
and currents.
- Climate and wave conditions
An understanding of the physical conditions affecting a beach,
and this data should be collected in association with the beach
data. Much of this data may already be available from other organisations.
Useful data includes tidal climates, wave heights, directions
and periods and wind directions and speeds. From this currents
and water heights can be calculated.
It is only when the information collected regarding
these different factors is combined that a full understanding of
the beach character and change can be obtained. A programme identifying
types of monitoring and methods should be established and adhered
to to allow comprehensive and useful datasets to develop.
Top
How frequently to monitor
A consistent and periodic monitoring regime should
be undertaken that enables data and information to be collected
at equal time intervals and at the same times each year. This enables
a comprehensive dataset to develop and provides enough information
for informed decisions to be made. However, some flexibility is
needed to allow for adhoc monitoring visits – after severe
storms, for example, when useful information may be gathered regarding
beach response to extreme conditions.
The frequency of monitoring depends upon the trends
that are of interest. If, for example, seasonal trends are required,
then surveys at 3-monthly intervals are appropriate chosen to coincide
with season changes, and carried out at the same times every year.
For long-term trends, the more surveys completed per year the better,
but the data set needs to be longer to guarantee any accurate results.
Therefore the most useful frequency would be at least 3 or 4 times
a year over a long period of time, enabling analysis of seasonal
changes and long-term trends. Short-term trends and fluctuations
require monitoring after storm events, or following a change in
conditions or beach management methods. For the most representative
view of the effects of storms on beaches, monitoring should be undertaken
as soon as practicable following the peak of the storm i.e. the
next low tide if possible.
Top
Analysis and use of data
A clearly defined approach is necessary for the
analysis of data, to enable best use to be made of it. This is especially
true if collecting data for the identification of long-term trends
where monitoring will be continued for a number of years, potentially
by a number of different people.
The Beach Management Manual (Simm et al., 1996)
states that the use of data requires reviewing the information obtained
and decided what further monitoring is necessary and whether changes
to the management strategy should be instigated.
To assure cost-effectiveness and efficiency of
monitoring, data should be analysed meaningfully before being used
to inform management decisions and be disseminated to the correct
audience. Monitoring practices should be reviewed every few years
to ensure that they are compatible with the contemporary requirements
and priorities, and to allow for the use of cheaper available methods.
Top
References
- Defra (2001). Shoreline management
plans: A guide for coastal defence authorities, Defra Publications,
London.
- Simm, J.D., Brampton, A.H., Beech,
N.W. and Brooke, J.S. (eds) (1996). Beach management manual, CIRIA
Report 153, London